Work

research

Make the evaluation question explicit

AI and mental-health research with evidence synthesis, prototype exploration, and human oversight.

Role
Research Assistant in AI and Mental Health
Status
Research role completed · June–September 2026
Synthetic procedural diagram of open evaluation frames. It contains no patient information, assessment, or research results.

Context and real problem

Mental-health AI research needs clear distinctions between a research idea, a prototype, and a system appropriate for care. Technical capability alone does not establish clinical usefulness, safety, or permission to handle sensitive information.

Andres’s role

In a Research Assistant role in AI and Mental Health, I contributed to evidence synthesis, research planning, prototype exploration, and scientific communication. The recorded period is June to September 2026.

Collaborators and setting

The work was within a University of Toronto / Unity Health Toronto research collaboration. Clinical and technical contributors bring different expertise. This is a research role; it does not imply a clinical appointment or independent responsibility for treatment.

Methods and tools

The work includes literature searching, evidence synthesis, methodological documentation, and evaluation planning for language-model and agent workflows. Python, version control, and language-model tooling support prototype exploration.

Responsibility and safety

Clinical safety, transparency, privacy, bias, and appropriate human oversight belong in the evaluation plan. A prototype must have a bounded purpose. Research on a conversational or agent workflow is not evidence that it can autonomously assess or treat someone.

Outputs and outcomes

My contributions included review material, evaluation planning, prototype exploration, and scientific communication. This is research-stage work; clinical effectiveness and readiness for use in care remain unestablished.

What I learned

Evaluation is part of defining a system, not a final score attached after building it. I want the clinical question, possible harms, and decisions requiring human responsibility to shape the research from the beginning.

Current status and links

The role ran from June to September 2026. The linked professional profile provides further career context. Unpublished research detail remains within the research setting.

What are you trying to understand?

If you are working on a question in health AI, public health, or biomedical innovation, I would be glad to compare approaches and learn what you are seeing.